Wednesday, March 15, 2006

WWBCD: What Would Brandy Chastain Do?


I grew up playing soccer - from kindergarten through college (Division III NCAA) - at various competitive levels. In my old age, I now simply play in a co-ed soccer league every Sunday. The co-ed league has a few rule twists to recognize the co-ed makeup of a team, but beyond the ones bulleted below, it is soccer and it is competitive.
  1. No more than 5 men field players can be on the field at a time. The goalie is asexual. This means you usually have 5 men and 5 women + 1 goalie.
  2. No slide tackles.
  3. Women must be 18 to play and men must be 23.
  4. If a woman scores a goal, it counts as two points.
The last two rules are the ones that just don't sit right with me. They have been established for some obvious (yet flawed, in my opinion) reasons.

The age limit: This can only be based upon the common perception that women mature quicker than men. While there may be studies that indicate this general pattern in our society, I can assure you that this rule is inappropriate for the league. I would only have to introduce you to a few players here or there and you would be convinced: sometimes, the older you get, the less mature you become. As a work around, I would like the league to either make the cutoff age for men and women equal (or) establish a Co-Ed Maturity, Soccer Assessment Test (CM-SAT). The test could have a series of questions along the lines of:
  • If a 200 lb 35 year old man wants to take you out into the parking lot after the game do you: a] deflate his tires after you sub out; b] laugh in his face and tweak his nipple; c] meet him in the parking lot as invited and proceed to start a brawl that develops into a multi-team/parent blood bath; or d] walk away and let the referee handle it?
  • You are playing a game and the winner of said game will be league champion. At halftime, your team is losing, lightning strikes are appearing on the horizon. Do you: a] Line up your team and either pray or perform a rain dance to ward off the weather; b] Yell at the opposition's team captain and claim that they are cheating because their rain dance is working and yours is not; c] Play in the lightning; or d] Reschedule the game to a later date.
Maybe an essay question as well. It would not be scored by the College Board or any association affiliated with the College Board.

2 Point Goals: This rule was initiated to encourage the involvement of women in the game. Unfortunately, it is not really accomplishing that at all. There are women in the league who are better than the men. The teams that win the league do so because they use all 11 players and everyone knows it. The "2 Point Goal" rule does accomplish a couple things well:
  • By rewarding women for scoring, in an unequal manner, it legitimizes the false impression that the women are not as good as the men.
  • When penalty kicks are awarded, teams have a woman take the kick and attempt to use this opportunity to get two quick points. Thus, the rule sets close games up for a series of pathetic dives in the box in an attempt to draw a foul and heartbreak losses on the heels of a referee who cannot distinguish acting. Trust me, it is not fun to watch a bunch of 200 lb 35 year old men with bruised nipples, bloody lips, and flat tires argue over whether or not there truly was a foul in the box.
I don't want to be viewed as someone who likes to complain. I love this soccer league and the competition is fierce. I do however, think that there is some room for improvement. Unfortunately, the only time people really care about these rules is when they work against their favor, on a Sunday, in the spring or fall, and only for 1.5 hours or so. Thus, change is hard to come by.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

You paint a good picture...

However, I like to refer to the goalie as unisex.

Go AFC!

Anonymous said...

It's KEEPER a "goalie" is a U-6 KEEPER!

AFC Rocks!

Unknown said...

Unisex might work if the term goalie was synonymous with clothing...oops. I'm sorry - "keeper."

I have seen one woman keeper so far this year - I believe she plays college ball and comes out to the league to stay sharp.

I have seen one keeper retire early. He is now a woman as well.

Anonymous said...

Damn... That is wrong!

Unknown said...

In the little town in BFE that I grew up in we played the following sports: football, basketball, and baseball. In addition to these sports we ran track. Soccer was for foreigners and city kids. The girls played volleyball because they didn't have football and obviously played softball instead of baseball. I literally know nothing about soccer.

I played in a coed basketball league in VA. It was a blast but it wasn't basketball. As a guy, you just had to realize you weren't playing basketball and have fun with this new game they were playing. You had to have 3 girls on the floor and 2 guys. Guys are not allowed inside the paint. Again, the rules were there to stack the game in favor of placing importance on the women.

Unknown said...

Yea. Soccer had made its way to the suburbs for my generation. :-)

Interesting that b-ball became a completely different game. Co-ed soccer is definitely still soccer. I have seen women take out guys and scream: "Stay down bitch!" It that's not competitive soccer, I don't know what is.

Unknown said...

First off. Thanks for the well thought out and long comment. Glad that you take the time to read. I agree on some points and will have to respectfully disagree on others. Here goes.

"The five male-, five female-rule was established to ensure the league remain true to it’s co-ed vision."

I agree with this rule. No complaints here. :-)

"The age limit is set because an 18-year old woman isn't as likely to erupt in a self-absorbed tantrum over a perceived slight as her same-age, less mature, counterpart."

I think I have to disagree here. I believe this rule is misguided. It is offensive to assume that all 18 year old men are not as mature as their counterpart female. This is simply discriminatory. Profiling. Whatever you want to call it.

"Case in point - there is no men's league for this exact reason."

I would be willing to bet money that over half the men in the fight that ended that men’s league were over 23. Easy money. Some of those men probably play co-ed now.

“Simply stated, it’s easier for men to score in a co-ed match.”

Agreed.

“If the goal value were the same for men and women, the opportunities for women to score off assists from men would likely decrease and eventually vanish”

I’m not sure this is true. I honestly do not think that anyone on our team attempts to set up women for the two point goal. Our women score because they can and because they are good. If the goal was worth one point, they would still score. The only time we really set women up for a goal is if we are simply creaming the opposition and don’t feel like pouring salt in the wound. In these games, we even pull our best women away from offense…because they score just as much as the men.

“I do, however, take exception to the “flopping” that takes place in close matches in an attempt to draw a foul and subsequent penalty kick. This behavior could be nipped (no pun intended) in the bud by allowing men only to take all penalty kicks.”

Agreed – the dives take away from the game. I would recommend making woman PK’s only worth one point.

“From kindergarten to the Olympics, other than mixed tennis doubles, men and women compete in separate groups. When combined, the rules must change to level the playing field.”

Agreed. It is just a question of degree I guess.